Encyclopedia of Popular Fiction
Email: popularfiction@gmail.com
Sample Text Entry
Red
Dragon Thomas Harris (1981)
Red
Dragon is a detective/thriller novel featuring Dr. Hannibal "The
Cannibal" Lecter, a brilliant but deranged psychiatrist who, after
committing a series of murders, has been incarcerated at the
Besides the descriptions of
outrageously brutal murders, perhaps the most disturbing element of Harris' work
is its insistence on the blurry line separating the law-abiding from the
criminal. This troubled boundary is made explicit in the characterization of
Graham, who is haunted by the feeling that he is fundamentally very similar to
the killers he tracks. A fellow investigator, Jack Crawford, notices that
Graham has a tendency to mimic the person he is speaking with, and that this
happens "involuntarily," for "sometimes he tried to stop and
couldn't" (Harris 4). Graham, according to Crawford, has "Imagination,
projection, whatever" (10) an exceptional empathy that makes it possible
for him to assume, often without wanting to, the malevolent perspectives of
killers. Lecter, who is always sensitive to any opportunity for manipulation,
repeatedly tries to unbalance Graham by reminding him of this affinity:
"Do you know how you caught me?"
Graham was out of Lecter's sight now, and he walked faster toward
the far steel door.
"The reason you caught me is that we're just alike" was
the last thing Graham heard as the steel door closed behind him. (86)
Late in the novel, Lecter continues his taunting of Graham
by insinuating in a letter that they both have taken pleasure in killing
(earlier in his career, Graham had gunned down a killer named
I want to help you, Will, and I'd like to start
by asking you this: When you were so depressed after you shot Mr. Garrett Jacob
Hobbs to death, it wasn't the act that got you down, was it? Really,
didn't you feel so bad because killing him felt so good? (348)
What frightens Graham - and readers - is the difficulty in
denying Lecter's claim. The ferocious dark side of the human mind cannot
be wholly disowned by the novel's hero, who is also, apparently, the only hope
the authorities have for catching those who have fully succumbed to evil.
Dolarhyde himself is an intriguing
mix of dark and light. Though he is detestable for having tortured and
murdered whole families, Harris makes clear that the killer has been a victim
himself, having suffered appalling childhood abuse. We see Dolarhyde's
potential for some kind of redemption in his relationship with Reba McLane, a
blind co-worker able to "see" beyond his disfigurement and social
awkwardness. The tenuous love Dolarhyde finds with McLane holds the
promise of delivering him from his grotesque calling, and he even tries to
sever his connection to the lethal "Dragon," the dark power he
worships, by gaining access to the
Another key subplot in the novel
concerns the sleazy tabloid reporter Freddie Lounds,
who is eventually murdered by Dolarhyde for writing unflattering descriptions
of him. Harris further explores here the blurry separation of the normal
and the deviant, as he points out the dark similarities between serial killing
and its serial mediation. The public's fascination with - and
trivialization of - the lurid details of violent crime is linked to the
killer's own perverse imagination. Just as Graham cannot help watching and
re-watching the same videos of the slaughtered families that fascinated
Dolarhyde, the public obsessively consumes the lurid details of violent
crimes. The difference between ordinary and pathological spectatorship
becomes very uncertain here, as all of us, as we read, are implicated in a
fascination with the particulars of sadistic acts.
The problem of this intimacy
between the civilized and the barbaric is resolved, if a little uneasily, at
the conclusion of the novel, when Graham considers that his own murderous
impulses - when acknowledged, controlled, and put in the service of humanity -
may be a necessary means for protecting civilized existence:
Graham knew too well that he contained all the
elements to make murder; perhaps mercy too.
He understood murder uncomfortably well, though.
He wondered if, in the great body of humankind, in the minds of
men set on civilization, the vicious urges we control in ourselves and the dark
instinctive knowledge of those urges function like the crippled virus the body
arms against.
He wondered if old, awful urges are the virus that makes
vaccine. (454)
By the novel's end, it is this slim hope that Graham must
cling to when contemplating his difference from those who give in to evil.
Lecter, who occupies the
imaginative centre of the novel, is a remarkably compelling character. His
appeal has much to do with the way he combines extreme viciousness with a
finely polished veneer of high-cultural sophistication. Trained as a
psychiatrist to penetrate the human psyche, and knowledgeable about a seemingly
infinite number of subjects, Lecter represents a sort of parody of the
hyper-cultivated human: his murderousness is concealed behind all the markings
of a civilized existence. By manipulating others and, when he can,
literally consuming them, Lecter pursues his calling as an aesthete, forging an
idiosyncratic artistic vision through violently transgressive acts. Even
when confined in a heavily secure mental institution, with very limited access
to resources, he is able to script a number of bloody dramas in the outside
world. The most impressive of these involves his discovery of Graham's
home address, and his goading of Dolarhyde into an attack on Graham and his
family.
While Dolarhyde's psychopathology
is, to some extent, explained away as the product of an abusive childhood and
physical disfigurement, Lecter remains by the novel's end a compelling
mystery. Dr. Frederick Chilton, the chief of staff at the state hospital
where Lecter is being held, calls his patient "a pure sociopath,"
though that tag hardly does justice to the complexity of the man. Chilton
reveals that he had hoped to study Lecter and gain some insight into his inner
workings, but laments that even after years of scrutiny, "I don't think
we're any closer to understanding him now than the day he came in" (77). This
unfathomable quality is essential to Lecter's enduring allure. Though
physically captured, he is somehow beyond the comprehension of all those who
would seek to know what motivates him.
Dolarhyde idolizes Lecter, and is
himself an aspiring aesthete. Shunned by others for his physical
disfigurement and social awkwardness, he cultivates a private world of beauty
and esoteric wisdom. The name he has chosen for himself, which
distinguishes him not just as a powerful figure but as a connoisseur of fine
art, as well as his knowledge of technology and Asian languages, separate him
from the ordinary mass of men. As Dolarhyde sees it, his personal growth -
or "Becoming" - involves exercising his rare powers in a predatory
campaign against those who oppose him. The basis of this campaign, which
finds its inspiration in Lecter's forbidding example, is the assumption of a
radical artistic license:
[…] In Dolarhyde's mind, Lecter's likeness should be
the dark portrait of a Renaissance prince. For Lecter, alone among all
men, might have the sensitivity and experience to understand the glory, the
majesty of Dolarhyde's Becoming.
Dolarhyde felt that Lecter knew the unreality of the people who
die to help you in these things - understood that they are not flesh, but light
and air and color and quick sounds quickly ended when you change them. Like balloons of color bursting. That they are more
important for the changing, more important than the lives they scrabble after,
pleading.
Dolarhyde bore screams as a sculptor bears dust from the beaten
stone. (121)
In such a scheme, the world becomes this dark artist's
canvass, its inhabitants mere material for the
realization of his grand vision.
A good deal of Harris' novel is
concerned with the techniques used by investigators in tracking down Dolarhyde.
Among these are the analysis of tooth marks made by the killer at the crime
scenes, fingerprints left on the cornea of a victim, and a psychological
profile of the killer delineating his secret psychological motivations. The
FBI's massive technological apparatus is ultimately shown to be inferior, however, to the eerie empathy Graham is able to
conjure for Dolarhyde. While institutional forces contribute to the capture of
the killer, it is a remarkable individual, standing outside the official
channels, who proves to be the decisive factor in the case.
Harris' novel has been adapted into
two films: the first, called Manhunter,
appeared in 1986; the second, which kept the title Red Dragon, appeared
in 2002 and starred Anthony Hopkins and Edward Norton.
- Geoff Hamilton
Bibliography
Harris,
Thomas. Hannibal Rising. New York: Delacourt Press, 2006.
---.
---. The Silence of the Lambs.
---. Red Dragon. 1981.
For
American Readers:
For
Canadian Readers: